Citroen C3 VS Toyota Aygo – Comparativa de especificaciones, consumo y precio

Citroen C3

El Citroën C3 es un hatchback compacto que destaca por su original diseño y su personalidad única. Su interior ofrece un ambiente cómodo y moderno, ideal para la ciudad y los viajes cortos. Además, la versatilidad de su espacio de carga lo convierte en una opción práctica para aquellos que buscan una conducción divertida sin sacrificar funcionalidad.

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

@ media.stellantis.com

Toyota Aygo

El Aygo se destaca por su diseño compacto y moderno, ideal para la vida urbana. Su maniobrabilidad y eficiencia en el consumo de combustible lo convierten en una opción atractiva para quienes buscan un vehículo práctico. Además, su personalización única permite a los conductores expresar su estilo personal en cada trayecto.

@ Toyota

@ Toyota

@ Toyota

@ Toyota

@ Toyota

@ Toyota

The Ultimate Showdown: Citroen C3 vs Toyota Aygo

The automotive market is teeming with compact cars designed for urban commuting, but two stand out among the crowd: the Citroen C3 and the Toyota Aygo. With different approaches to design, performance, and technology, both vehicles appeal to a diverse demographic. In this comparison, we'll delve into their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall driving experience to help you decide which compact car is the better fit for your lifestyle.

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to dimensions, the Citroen C3 measures in at 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height. It boasts a spacious trunk capacity of 310 liters, catering well to daily needs. In contrast, the Toyota Aygo takes a more compact approach, with length, width, and height measured at 3700 mm, 1740 mm, and 1510 mm, respectively. The Aygo’s trunk offers a smaller capacity of 231 liters, making it more suitable for city dwellers who prioritize maneuverability over storage space.

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The Citroen C3 presents a variety of engine options, including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle), with power outputs ranging from 101 to 113 HP. Its fuel consumption sits between 5.5 to 5.6 L/100 km, depending on the variant, while the electric model boasts a range of 320 to 326 km, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers. The C3’s acceleration is impressive, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 9.9 seconds with higher variants.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo is equipped with a petrol engine that produces 72 HP, paired with a consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100 km. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h lags behind the C3, taking around 15.5 to 15.6 seconds, which may deter those seeking a more spirited drive. However, the Aygo’s lightweight design, with a curb weight of just 1015 kg, enhances its agility in city driving conditions.

Transmission and Drive Type

Both models offer a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The Citroen C3 features a robust dual-clutch automatic option, improving driving comfort and efficiency. In contrast, the Aygo comes with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), providing smooth acceleration and responsiveness in urban traffic.

Both cars utilize a front-wheel drive configuration, but the power delivery in the Citroen C3, with its more powerful engines, tends to deliver a snappier driving experience compared to the lighter but less powerful Toyota Aygo.

Technology and Features

Citroen has equipped the C3 with modern technology and driver assistance features, catering to drivers who appreciate connectivity and safety. With its advanced infotainment system, touchscreen interface, and smartphone integration capabilities, the C3 stands out as a tech-savvy option for younger consumers. Its climate control, navigation, and safety features are designed to enhance overall comfort and driving confidence.

Meanwhile, the Toyota Aygo retains a more stripped-down tech approach but includes essential features aimed at providing a reliable driving experience. Its infotainment system is straightforward and easy to use, fitting well with the Aygo's youthful and practical branding. Although it lacks some of the advanced tech of the C3, it excels in delivering no-fuss utility.

Safety and Environmental Impact

Safety ratings for both vehicles are commendable, with the Citroen C3 offering a variety of standard safety features such as lane assist and emergency braking. The CO2 emissions for the C3 hover at around 126 g/km, making it a fairly eco-friendly choice compared to its competitors.

The Toyota Aygo, with its CO2 efficiency class rated at C, emits roughly 108 to 112 g/km of CO2, showcasing its own eco-credentials in the compact segment. While not as complex as the C3, it serves as a solid option for urban environments where low emissions are sought after.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Citroen C3 and Toyota Aygo each present their own strengths and weaknesses. The C3 is better suited for those who seek a blend of performance, space, and modern technology, making it ideal for a family or those who require more versatility in their vehicle.

Conversely, the Aygo shines in urban agility and efficiency, perfect for city dwellers who value simplicity and straightforward functionality. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your specific needs—whether that leans more towards space and tech or agility and everyday practicality.